“…the question of what teachers should understand if they wish to teach a domain responsibly is no simple challenge. In the field of English teaching, where canons are under question and “consensus” is more frequently misspelled than accomplished, the problem of teacher knowledge is daunting.”
In her paper ‘Knowing, Believing and the Teaching of English’, quoted above, Pamela Grossman outlines just some of the key challenges faced by those who try to define the knowledge English teachers require. In essence, they are that:
- There are numerous ways of dividing up the English curriculum. For example, some argue it can be split into linguistics, literature and composition whilst others would divide it into reading, writing, speaking and listening.
- English, particularly reading, is an interpretive domain and there are many interpretive schools of thought. There is therefore a question about the number of standpoints which teachers should be able to take. There is also a pedagogic question about whether it is a teacher’s role to tease out the interpretations from students or know them all themself.
- The history of literature is as sprawling as history itself. How extensively should teachers know the impact of contexts on the texts being studied?
- Our memories and understanding of how we developed procedural knowledge in writing and reading is buried deep, so expressing this to novices in a useful way is challenging.
There are many more issues than this. In each case though the most important element in finding a solution is ensuring clarity in the English curriculum.
Teachers require this clarity in order to know what their students ought to know so that they can also know how to preempt and address issues when their students don’t know what it is they should know as well as they should know it. Clarity is vital isn’t it?
The issues Grossman outlines in English teaching impact on our understanding of what Shulman terms pedagogical content knowledge (PCK).
PCK is a form of practical knowledge that is used by teachers to guide their decisions and actions in subject focused classrooms. This type of practical knowledge requires, amongst other things:
1. Knowledge of the relationship between content and students – a grasp of the common conceptions, misconceptions, and difficulties that students encounter when learning particular content.
2. Knowledge of the relationship between content and the curriculum – how to sequence, structure academic content to maximise the impact of direct teaching to students.
3. Knowledge of the relationship between content and teaching – the specific teaching strategies, pedagogical techniques and ways of representing, modelling and explaining knowledge that can be used to address students’ learning needs in particular classroom circumstances with specific content.
I’d like to look at each of these in turn with a specific focus on PCK in English.
As a starting point, I think it would be useful to begin a list of the key realisations students need to have in the field of English. Where students haven’t had these realisations, misconceptions emerge. Over time, I’d like to build up a resource a little like this from the AAAS in science.
Realisations for students of English language, literature and composing texts:
That the following words are not the same:
- Your and you’re
- Their, there and they’re
- Two, to and too
- Practice and practise
- Bought and brought
- It’s and its
- Desert and dessert
- Dryer and drier
- Chose and choose
- Lose and loose
Grammar – Words
That nouns aren’t simply people, places and things.
That an adverb is a word or phrase that modifies the meaning of an adjective, verb, or other adverb, expressing manner, place, time, or degree. Not all adverbs end in ly and not all words ending in ly are adverbs.
That verbs aren’t simply “doing words.”
That adjectives aren’t simply “describing words.”
That a word can have different functions, dependent on the context in which it is used.
Grammar – Sentences
That the placement of a full stop or comma in a text isn’t defined by the need to breathe.
That simple sentences are not just short sentences.
That complex sentences aren’t simply long or just filled with complex information.
That writers will break syntactical conventions for specific reasons.
That we don’t use a modal verb, like should, with “of” because “of” is not a verb, it is a preposition. Some people write “should of” because when they speak, they say “should’ve.”
That subjects and verbs in sentences need to be in agreement. For example, we write I/he/she/it was but we/they/you were.
Reading for understanding
That many writers will bother to spend a great deal of time considering lexical and syntactic choices.
That (chains of) words can be used by writers as symbols.
That writers do not necessarily write with the same voice they use for speaking.
That the views of a narrator are not necessarily the same as the views of the writer.
That there can be more than one narrator of a story.
That we can’t always trust what we’re told by the narrator of a story.
That writers organise their texts for both clarity and influence.
That your interpretation of (part of) a text may not be the only one.
That, though there are often multiple possible interpretations of a literary text, there are also wrong interpretations.
That writers don’t start from scratch every time. They draw on ideas from other people and they adapt and combine forms and often use archetypal characters.
That some writers use the plot and characters in their texts as a way of commenting on society or providing a moral message.
That writers, particularly of non-fiction, often consider the nature and scale of their audience in deciding how to write rather than just setting off.
That the act of writing for a public audience is done to influence thoughts, feelings or actions.
That characters in fiction books aren’t the same as real people.
That writers sometimes deliberately use cliche.
That a narrative is still fictional, even if its context is real.
Composition – General
That it is better to carefully consider the precise words you want to use than include as many words as you can.
That the language you’re using may not be standard English.
That what we write about and how we write is influenced by the world around us as well as who we are writing for.
That some people will judge you based on the way you speak and write.
Composition – Creative
That adding ellipses at the end of (part of) a story doesn’t increase the tension and is an unnecessary way of highlighting a cliffhanger.
Composition – Analytical
That all writers want their audience to read on so there are more interesting things you could say about the effects of their language choices.
That a text implies rather infers and a reader infers rather than implies from a text.
That rhetorical questions have a more specific purpose than to make the reader think.
That a quotation is a group of words taken from a written or a spoken text.
That you do not have to agree with the writer in order to be able to see their point of view.
That, even though you find a text dull, it can still have literary or wider cultural value.
Composition – Rhetorical
Composition – Structure
That a change in paragraph marks a shift in time, place, topic, point of view or speaker in dialogue but that writers sometimes break these conventions for effect.
That the plot of a story doesn’t always have to be told in chronological order.